Peer Review Guidelines

Thank you for agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer for Iris Journals. Your expertise and insights play a vital role in maintaining the quality and integrity of the research we publish. To ensure a fair and constructive peer review process, please consider the following guidelines:

1. Confidentiality: Treat the review process as confidential. Do not disclose or discuss the manuscript or its content with anyone without the explicit permission of the journal editor.

2. Timeliness: Notify the journal editor promptly if you are unable to complete the review within the given timeline. Time is of the essence in providing timely feedback to authors.

3. Objectivity and Integrity: Conduct the review objectively, without any bias or conflicts of interest. If you have any potential conflicts, such as a personal or professional relationship with the authors, notify the editor immediately.

4. Scope and Fit: Assess whether the manuscript is within the scope of Iris Journal and contributes to the existing knowledge in the field. Consider the appropriateness of the research question, methodology, and findings for our readership.

5. Originality and Significance: Evaluate the originality and significance of the research. Assess whether the manuscript presents new insights, advances the field, or challenges existing knowledge.

6. Methodology and Analysis: Evaluate the research design, data collection, and analysis methods. Consider the appropriateness of the methods used, the clarity of presentation, and the validity of the results. Comment on any potential limitations or alternative approaches.

7. Clarity and Structure: Assess the clarity and organization of the manuscript. Evaluate the quality of writing, the logical flow of the content, and the adequacy of figures, tables, and references. Provide suggestions for improving the overall structure and readability.

8. Ethical Considerations: Assess whether the manuscript adheres to ethical standards. Identify any potential ethical concerns such as plagiarism, data fabrication, or inadequate participant consent. Notify the editor of any such concerns.

9. Constructive Feedback: Provide clear and constructive feedback to the authors. Highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript and offer specific suggestions for improvement. Be respectful in your comments and focus on helping the authors enhance the quality of their work.

10. Confidential Comments to the Editor: If you have any confidential comments or concerns about the manuscript, you can include them in a separate confidential section to be shared with the editor. These comments should not be disclosed to the authors.

11. Recommendations for Decision: Based on your assessment, make a recommendation to the editor regarding the suitability of the manuscript for publication. Use the following options: Accept, Accept with Minor Revisions, Major Revisions Required, Reject.

12. Constructive Tone: Ensure that your comments and criticisms are presented in a constructive and professional manner. Maintain a respectful tone, focusing on the content rather than the authors themselves.

Thank you for your valuable contribution to the peer review process of Iris Journals. Your efforts and expertise are greatly appreciated in maintaining the high standards of our publication.